<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Easy-to-Use Is Your Website?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wevegotideas.com/2010/01/15/easy-website-usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wevegotideas.com/2010/01/15/easy-website-usability/</link>
	<description>marketing and branding musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:45:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://wevegotideas.com/2010/01/15/easy-website-usability/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wevegotideas.com/?p=853#comment-894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Josh - True, not all sites have the luxury of hiring a usability tester regularly, however basic usability testing can be done by employing a family member, an intern, or any employee who does not use the site process on a daily basis and is completely accustomed to the required steps. It may not be as thorough as hiring someone, but in a pinch, it will let you know where the glaring inconsistencies are.

Which, that&#039;s better than nothing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Josh &#8211; True, not all sites have the luxury of hiring a usability tester regularly, however basic usability testing can be done by employing a family member, an intern, or any employee who does not use the site process on a daily basis and is completely accustomed to the required steps. It may not be as thorough as hiring someone, but in a pinch, it will let you know where the glaring inconsistencies are.</p>
<p>Which, that&#8217;s better than nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Gibbs</title>
		<link>http://wevegotideas.com/2010/01/15/easy-website-usability/#comment-892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Gibbs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 02:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wevegotideas.com/?p=853#comment-892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I totally agree. Recently I needed to replace the belt in my vacuum cleaner. After a few minutes of Googling around, I decided to go to the manufacturer&#039;s website. It was extremely easy to use.

However, some sites don&#039;t have the luxury of usability testing on a regular basis. For them, it may be better to list their products on other sites that help market, sell, and follow up to customers. Sites like Amazon and Google Checkout are my top picks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. Recently I needed to replace the belt in my vacuum cleaner. After a few minutes of Googling around, I decided to go to the manufacturer&#8217;s website. It was extremely easy to use.</p>
<p>However, some sites don&#8217;t have the luxury of usability testing on a regular basis. For them, it may be better to list their products on other sites that help market, sell, and follow up to customers. Sites like Amazon and Google Checkout are my top picks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

